IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Next one
JackFlashblade
post Jan 27 2015, 08:33 PM
Post #1


Hero
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,136
Joined: 1-December 07
Member No.: 190



Hey guys, my last few attempts to organise a higher level COTC fell through, so I am happy to ref a lower points one for 4th / 5th April, or Crew it if you want to (and can persuade) Lee to ref a carry on from the previous one.

Chris
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Meganerd
post Jan 27 2015, 08:37 PM
Post #2


Mercenary
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1,877
Joined: 23-November 07
From: Muswell Hill, London
Member No.: 70



QUOTE(JackFlashblade @ Jan 27 2015, 08:33 PM) *
Hey guys, my last few attempts to organise a higher level COTC fell through, so I am happy to ref a lower points one for 4th / 5th April, or Crew it if you want to (and can persuade) Lee to ref a carry on from the previous one.

Chris


Can't make that date

Ed
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Christine
post Jan 27 2015, 08:37 PM
Post #3


Legend
********

Group: Members
Posts: 3,888
Joined: 23-November 07
Member No.: 110



Alas I can't do either of those days. However we do have a 1k ish Baronies thing booked on 7th March, which Mr Isteed has agreed to ref - no reason why we couldn't turn that into a low level Claws thing if that worked for the rest of the party.

C
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JackFlashblade
post Jan 27 2015, 09:03 PM
Post #4


Hero
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,136
Joined: 1-December 07
Member No.: 190



Sounds like a cunning plan!

May be worth contacting Isteed / rest of the party sooner rather than later if you want to hijack it for Claws.

C
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RichFromant
post Jan 27 2015, 09:07 PM
Post #5


Legend
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,814
Joined: 23-November 07
From: Welling
Member No.: 37



I am busy on the 4th but could do the 5th April, I am about 3.5k now as my warlock.


--------------------
Rich

For extended length bookings and queries please use fromum@labyrinthe.co.uk
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Will
post Jan 27 2015, 09:14 PM
Post #6


Mercenary
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1,497
Joined: 26-November 07
From: London
Member No.: 158



Also cannot do that weekend 😔


--------------------
It's not Hardcore... it's Willcore!
Stats make me hard
Roll the dice to see if I'm getting drunk!
Will Power... lowering the tone
QUOTE("Brave Sir Robin")
thanks to will for being both the foundation and leader for all we do.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Will
post Feb 15 2015, 09:08 PM
Post #7


Mercenary
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1,497
Joined: 26-November 07
From: London
Member No.: 158



Did this get booked?

Also, will be putting together a guild board to go up this weekend.

ALSO, monster points, eternal guild, anyone? smile.gif


--------------------
It's not Hardcore... it's Willcore!
Stats make me hard
Roll the dice to see if I'm getting drunk!
Will Power... lowering the tone
QUOTE("Brave Sir Robin")
thanks to will for being both the foundation and leader for all we do.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stuart
post Feb 15 2015, 09:35 PM
Post #8


Legend
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,317
Joined: 23-November 07
Member No.: 39



It's worth mentioning that the old restrictions are a little difficult for Baronial characters who aren't Circle, but still generally support it:

"May not be members of any other open guild, organisation, Church, or similar, except The Circle. This is the only open guild that they may belong to."

It means I couldn't join as my (non-Circle) Baronial, cos I quite fancy battleboarding a professional guild. Given it's a social guild, could the restriction be relaxed a little to include non-power using Baronials in the new version, and let them have non-conflicting guilds?

Ta,

Stuart
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Christine
post Feb 15 2015, 09:58 PM
Post #9


Legend
********

Group: Members
Posts: 3,888
Joined: 23-November 07
Member No.: 110



That seems sensible to me, providing the non power-users are Circle loyal rather than filthy hedge.....

So who do we have on the 7th, Claws-wise? Me, Giles, Stuart, Lee and Fi?

C


QUOTE(Stuart @ Feb 15 2015, 09:35 PM) *
It's worth mentioning that the old restrictions are a little difficult for Baronial characters who aren't Circle, but still generally support it:

"May not be members of any other open guild, organisation, Church, or similar, except The Circle. This is the only open guild that they may belong to."

It means I couldn't join as my (non-Circle) Baronial, cos I quite fancy battleboarding a professional guild. Given it's a social guild, could the restriction be relaxed a little to include non-power using Baronials in the new version, and let them have non-conflicting guilds?

Ta,

Stuart
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JackFlashblade
post Feb 15 2015, 11:03 PM
Post #10


Hero
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,136
Joined: 1-December 07
Member No.: 190



QUOTE(Stuart @ Feb 15 2015, 09:35 PM) *
It's worth mentioning that the old restrictions are a little difficult for Baronial characters who aren't Circle, but still generally support it:

"May not be members of any other open guild, organisation, Church, or similar, except The Circle. This is the only open guild that they may belong to."

It means I couldn't join as my (non-Circle) Baronial, cos I quite fancy battleboarding a professional guild. Given it's a social guild, could the restriction be relaxed a little to include non-power using Baronials in the new version, and let them have non-conflicting guilds?

Ta,

Stuart


Sounds like a good plan.

Any suggestions as to the new wording?

Chris
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Will
post Feb 15 2015, 11:38 PM
Post #11


Mercenary
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1,497
Joined: 26-November 07
From: London
Member No.: 158



That restriction isn't in the new almanac smile.gif

So, eternal? Who's in? smile.gif


--------------------
It's not Hardcore... it's Willcore!
Stats make me hard
Roll the dice to see if I'm getting drunk!
Will Power... lowering the tone
QUOTE("Brave Sir Robin")
thanks to will for being both the foundation and leader for all we do.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stuart
post Feb 16 2015, 06:57 AM
Post #12


Legend
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,317
Joined: 23-November 07
Member No.: 39



QUOTE(Will @ Feb 15 2015, 11:38 PM) *
That restriction isn't in the new almanac smile.gif


Oh? Er, looks like you've already updated the restrictions, Chris. Good work!

I was thinking "Must recognise the Circle as the principal authority on matters supernatural." It's pretty gentle but still stops worshippers of dragons and gods from getting involved.

Stuart
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Will
post Feb 16 2015, 09:21 AM
Post #13


Mercenary
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1,497
Joined: 26-November 07
From: London
Member No.: 158



It's sort of implied but yeah, that would be an awesome addition to the restrictions imho


--------------------
It's not Hardcore... it's Willcore!
Stats make me hard
Roll the dice to see if I'm getting drunk!
Will Power... lowering the tone
QUOTE("Brave Sir Robin")
thanks to will for being both the foundation and leader for all we do.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JackFlashblade
post Feb 16 2015, 11:57 PM
Post #14


Hero
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,136
Joined: 1-December 07
Member No.: 190




So, any objections to adding Stuarts suggestion of:

"Must recognise the Circle as the principal authority on matters supernatural",

And removing:

"Must support the basic political principles of the Southern Baronies".

The politics in the Baronies seem a lot less clear cut than they used to, so it seems a sensible swap.

Chris
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Will
post Feb 17 2015, 12:13 AM
Post #15


Mercenary
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1,497
Joined: 26-November 07
From: London
Member No.: 158



Agreed

QUOTE(JackFlashblade @ Feb 16 2015, 11:57 PM) *
So, any objections to adding Stuarts suggestion of:

"Must recognise the Circle as the principal authority on matters supernatural",

And removing:

"Must support the basic political principles of the Southern Baronies".

The politics in the Baronies seem a lot less clear cut than they used to, so it seems a sensible swap.

Chris



--------------------
It's not Hardcore... it's Willcore!
Stats make me hard
Roll the dice to see if I'm getting drunk!
Will Power... lowering the tone
QUOTE("Brave Sir Robin")
thanks to will for being both the foundation and leader for all we do.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stuart
post Feb 17 2015, 06:51 AM
Post #16


Legend
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,317
Joined: 23-November 07
Member No.: 39



Eeek, no! I meant take out the bit about 'can belong to no other organisation than the Circle', and replace it with my suggestion above. The bit about supporting the basic political principles of the Baronies is a really good restriction. It makes it clear this organisation supports the Party Line in the South.

Stuart

[Edit: Flaming smartphones]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Christine
post Feb 17 2015, 07:05 AM
Post #17


Legend
********

Group: Members
Posts: 3,888
Joined: 23-November 07
Member No.: 110



Yes, don't take out the bit about basic political principles! What Stuart said.

C
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JackFlashblade
post Feb 17 2015, 08:01 AM
Post #18


Hero
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,136
Joined: 1-December 07
Member No.: 190



QUOTE(Stuart @ Feb 17 2015, 06:51 AM) *
Eeek, no! I meant take out the bit about 'can belong to no other organisation than the Circle', and replace it with my suggestion above. The bit about supporting the basic political principles of the Baronies is a really good restriction. It makes it clear this organisation supports the Party Libe in the South.

Stuart


Ok, my thinking on taking this part of it out are that when the guild was set up the politics in the baronies seemed pretty unified and clear cut. Now there seems to be some political conflict within those who rule the baronies. Members of the Circle need to appear to not involve themselves in internal politics, therefore the restriction no longer seems to fit to my mind. Maybe the wording could be altered insterad to take this into account. Thoughts?

Chris
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stuart
post Feb 17 2015, 08:54 AM
Post #19


Legend
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,317
Joined: 23-November 07
Member No.: 39



I think the basic political principles are fine - the Circle don't get involved in politics and advise the Barons, that way nobody gets ritually struck.

There might be some political conflict, but it's within the confines of accepting ritual war is a bad thing, mmkay, and by having the current basic political structure we avoid going the way of the crazy north with their theocratic cities.

You can backstab and jostle for position as much as you want, but suggesting a member of the Seven should seize power as a Waldegraf would be unthinkable.

Stuart
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JackFlashblade
post Feb 17 2015, 09:25 AM
Post #20


Hero
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,136
Joined: 1-December 07
Member No.: 190



Ok dude, I see that. I'll leave that as is.

C
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th November 2017 - 06:20 AM
Original Darkness Skin Created by Danellis
Converted by Mdgshorty of New Horizon Skins